Tag Archives: Facebook

Security News for the Week Ending April 19, 2019

Microsoft Pulls Patches AGAIN After Some Computers Become Super Secure

Users of Sophos and Avast, especially those running Windows 7 or Windows 8 – but not Windows 10 – got their computers bricked after this month’s update.  Microsoft has had multiple update failures over the last 6 months, causing admins to wait a week or two before installing patches.  In general, this is probably an acceptable risk.  In this case, users had to boot the computer in safe mode, disable their AV, reboot and uninstall the patch.  Then they can re-enable the AV software.  A bit of a pain for companies with a lot of PCs.  Microsoft has now blocked the patch if it sees a problem machine.

NOTE:  If you need a reason to update to Windows 10, Microsoft is releasing an update to back out these failed updates automatically, but, of course, only in Windows 10.

Source: The Register.

Facebook is, Apparently, in the Black Market Business

For many people, who do not love Facebook, they would have said this even before this revelation, but now it is official.

Facebook really does not have the ability to police billions of accounts.  You just can’t get there from here.

This time, researchers at Cisco’s Talos group found 74 groups selling criminal wares, very publicly, on Facebook.  Everything from stolen credit cards to spamming tools.

The groups, which had close to 400,000 members have been removed.  No doubt, immediately replaced with new ones.  Source: Info Security Magazine.

Genesee County Michigan Joins Many Other Municipalities in Falling to Ransomware

Genesee County was hit by a ransomware attack last week.  Initially, they said no biggie, they would be back the next day.  A week later, they are still wrestling with it, although, it appears, they have a lot of services back online and seem to be making progress towards the rest.

While they are keeping mum about the details, it certainly appears that they had a good backup and disaster recovery strategy, unlike a lot of cities and towns (remember Atlanta last year?)   Source: SC Magazine.

 

China Is Following in US Lead – US Upset

Huawei Marine Networks is currently constructing or improving nearly 100 submarine cables.

Similar to the Hauwei 5G controversy, western intelligence is concerned that they might eavesdrop on the data since just one cable with multiple fibers might carry 100 gigabits of traffic or more –  a very nice prize.

Until recently, the United States and its friends in the Five Eyes countries have had somewhat of a monopoly in spying on Internet traffic.

Now China and other not so friendly countries have the ability also and want in on the action.  The United States would prefer to keep the capability to itself.

Since the U.S. has repeatedly preferred a less secure Internet to make it easier for it to spy on others (consider the NSA’s successful efforts to modify encryption standards to make them easier to crack as has been revealed over the last few years as just  one example).  Now that others have the ability to spy on us as well, the lack of security works both ways.  According to Bruce Schneier, the U.S. is going to have to make a decision – a secure Internet which is harder for everyone to hack or a weak Internet which is easy for our adversaries to crack.  Source: Bruce Schneier.

Hacker Publishes Personal Information on Thousands of Law Enforcement Agents

Hackers believed to be based in Ukraine claim to have hacked more than 1,000  sites and have published the personal information (names, phone numbers and street addresses)  of about 4,000 federal agents such as the FBI Academy grads.

When a reporter asked if the hacker was concerned that putting this information out would put federal agents at risk, he responded “Probably, yes”.  The hacker also demonstrated being able to deface an FBI Academy Alumni Site.  His motivation, he said, is money.

The hacker claims to have data on over 1 million  people and is working on formatting it to sell.

The FBI Academy Alumni Association only said that it was investigating.  Techcrunch is NOT publishing the name of the hacker’s website.  Source: Tech Crunch.

 

Expensive IoT Hack

Car2Go, recently renamed Share Now, has suspended its service in Chicago out of “an abundance of caution”.

That caution comes from the fact that 100 of their cars were stolen and some of them used in crimes.  Half of the cars were Mercedes.

Some people have been arrested and a few cars have been recovered.

If we assume that the average cost of one of these vehicles is $50,000 then the loss of 100 cars and the brand damage from news reports like “Robbing a bank?  Steal a Cars2Go to make your getaway” or whatever, is significant.  While the hard cost could be covered by insurance, likely the bigger issue is that they don’t understand how the Car2Go app was hacked to allow the thieves to steal a large number of expensive luxury cars.  They likely won’t restart the service until they figure that out.

One more time, Internet of Things security is a challenge (I assume that you use the app to unlock and start the car).  In this case, they probably spent a bit on security, but apparently not enough.

This is one case where APPLICATION PENETRATION TESTING and RED TEAM EXERCISES become very important.  Luckily the hackers weren’t terrorists and didn’t use the cars to kill people.  That would have been a real challenge to do damage control over.

We need to work diligently on IoT security before it becomes more than a financial issue.  Source: NY Daily News.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmailby feather

Facebook Stored Millions (Billions?) of Passwords Unencrypted for Years

Seems like Facebook can’t catch a break.  Whether it is Cambridge Analytica or one of the many other scandals plaguing the company, it seems like the only news coverage they get is bad coverage.

This time it is information that Facebook logged users’ passwords in plain text for anyone to read, stored those logs on internal company servers and gave access to that data to tens of thousands of employees.

Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play tonight?

The internal investigation, which began in January and is still ongoing, discovered that 2,000 employees made 9 million queries for data elements that contained plain text user passwords.

Facebook says that the passwords were logged in plain text “inadvertently”.  Possibly, but since protecting passwords is like programming 101 or maybe even programming 001, how could that be?

Facebook now says that they plan to tell people that their passwords were exposed.   Sometime.  They did post an announcement of the situation, here.

Facebook says that they will need to notify hundreds of millions of Facebook light users (light is the version that is used in the places where bandwidth is at a premium), tens of millions of other Facebook users and tens of thousands of Instagram users.

So what should you do?

I would recommend changing your Facebook password no matter whether you receive notice from them or not.

If you use the same password on any other web sites, change those passwords too.

Enable two factor authentication on the Facebook web site.  This is very simple to do and provides a lot of extra protection.

Review what third party apps you have given permission to access your Facebook data.

If you were sharing passwords between web sites, this is perfect reason not to do that.  Using a password manager makes it a lot easier to use unique passwords.

Facebook supports using an authenticator app such as Authy or Google Authenticator as the second factor rather than text messages.  It APPEARS that if you have a phone number associated with your account, they insist on allowing you to use that in an emergency.  Which means a hacker can declare an emergency.  Remove your phone number from your account to solve that problem.  Probably a good idea anyway.

Information for this post came from Brian Krebs.

 

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmailby feather

Security News Bites for the Week Ending February 15, 2019

Anybody Know What 5G Cellular Means?

5G is the next generation of cellular, promising blindingly fast service and web page loads in the blink of an eye.

Unfortunately, it doesn’t really exist yet.  Yes, a few carriers have set up a few cell sites in a few cities, but there are basically NO phones that are 5G capable at this time.  Apple should launch one in 2020.

5G will also require a LOT more cell sites that don’t exist and that most people don’t want in their backyard.

What this means in reality is that 5G won’t be a factor for years and in many places – low density areas – it may never come due to the expense.  And definitely not until you buy a new phone.

But that hasn’t stopped AT&T from adding a 5G “e” to some of their phones.  AT&T is doing preemptive marketing hoping that people won’t understand that they are not getting 5G service and not getting a 5G capable phone.  But, by that time, they will be locked in.

AT&T says the “E” means evolution, whatever that means.  Other people say the “E” means eventually – just not with that phone or that cell site.

Here’s what Verizon said about it:

5Ge. It’s pretend, it’s fake, it’s the kind of BS that gives marketers, communicators businesses and the wireless industry a black eye. So let’s have some fun. Some people call it “Faux Five G”. There’s “5G Eventually”. What’s your name for @ATT false marketing?

So Sprint is suing AT&T.  AT&T says that people won’t be confused.  Sprint did a survey in which 17% of the people said that they already had this non-existent 5G service.  Stay tuned.  Source: PC Mag.

 

Discarded Smart Lightbulbs May Be a Security Hole

Smart lightbulbs are smart because they are network connected and since most people are not going to plug a network cable into that bulb, they talk over WiFi.

Researchers took a LIFX smart bulb apart and took the circuit board out of it.  When they analyzed the board they found the WiFi password – not encrypted.

Next all of the security settings for the processor are disabled.

Finally, the company’s RSA private encryption key and root certificate are also accessible.

Given this takes a bit of work to reverse engineer, it is not likely a hacker is going to do it, but to get the company’s private encryption key, which would allow them to sign malicious code and download it wherever they want – that would be worthwhile.

Maybe they should call it a dumb lightbulb.  Source: Limited Results web site.

 

If You Live in the UK, be Careful Where You Click 

The UK signed into law (what they call Royal Assent) the Counter Terrorism and Border Security law this week.  This law makes it a crime to VIEW information “likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism”.

One click.  Penalty is up to 15 years in prison.

Seems like a bit of over-reaction to me.  The UK’s special rapporteur on privacy said the law was “pushing a bit too much towards the thought crime”.  1984, we are here.  Source: The UK Register.

 

FTC in Negotiations with Facebook over Multi-Billion Dollar Fine

Sources have confirmed that the FTC and Facebook are negotiating over a multi-billion dollar fine over Facebook’s privacy practices.  The details have not been released and it could ultimately wind up in court if the two sides cannot agree.  If it does, get your popcorn out because it could be a humdinger.  The FTC’s investigation has been going on for about a year.  Source: Washington Post.

 

Gov Testing Smartphones as a Replacement for CAC Access Cards

The DoD is testing whether your smartphone can identify you as well as their current Common Access Card to get into DoD buildings and computer systems.

Your smartphone knows how you walk, how you talk, how you type.  You get the idea, but there is more.

With software on the phone, they are going to know exactly where you are at every moment of the day, where you spend your free time (maybe you have someone on the side), what web sites you visit, what bars you visit and how long you stay there.

It may work, but it may be a little bit too 1984 for me.

Using constant monitoring of the user’s behavior—including how they walk, carry the device, type and navigate on it and even how they commute to work and spend their free time—and the system will automatically and continuously verify the user’s identity, enabling them to seamlessly work on secure networks without having to plug in a card each time. Source: Nextgov .

 

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmailby feather

Security News Bites for the Week Ending February 8, 2019

Text Messaging for Two Factor Authentication is Under Attack

We have talked on occasion about a basically theoretical attack against text messages as the second factor for authentication.  It is likely that the feds know more than they are telling us about that since the National Institute of Standards and Technology has deprecated the use of text messaging for two factor for new systems.

Now we are seeing a large, in the wild, attack against real two factor authentication, specifically in banking.

Britain’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), part of their GCHQ spy-guys, admitted that they are aware that this is being exploited.   As are the telephone carriers.

The attack vector still requires a very sophisticated hacker because it requires the attacker to compromise some phone company and inject fake SS7 commands into the system for the targeted phone number.  Hard, but far from impossible.

Still, in light of this being a real-world-empty-your-bank-account kind of attack, financial institutions should begin the transition away from text messaging to two factor apps (like Google Authenticator and others) to protect client accounts sooner rather than later.  Source: Motherboard.

 

Unnamed Energy Company (Duke) Fined $10 Million for Security Lapses

An unnamed energy company received the largest fine of its type ever at $10 million for security lapses,  including letting unauthorized people into secure areas and allowing uncleared computers to connect to secure networks, sometimes for months at a time.

The fine covers 130 violations.

The reason the company is unnamed is that it is likely the list of identified vulnerabilities is not complete and the identified holes are not all closed.

The WSJ reports that the company is Duke Energy.  So much for keeping their name out of the media.

This certainly could explain why many people say that the bad guys already “own” our energy utilities.  Source: Biz Journals.

 

Another Cryptocurrency Debacle

I keep saying that attacks on Cryptocurrency will not be on the math (encryption) but rather on the systems and software.

This week QuadrigaCX filed for the Canadian version of bankruptcy protection saying that they stored the vast majority of their assets in offline storage wallets and the only person who had the key was their CEO, who died suddenly.

They claim to have lost access to $145 million in a variety of cryptocurrencies and do not have the money to repay their customers.

Some users and researchers are skeptical of this story (really, no backup?  To over $140 million)?  Seems hard to swallow.

The researchers, after looking at the block chain, say that they can find no evidence that QuadrigaCX has anything close to $100 million in Bitcoin and perhaps the founder’s death was faked as an exit scam.

Assuming this all plays out the way it seems, customers are going to be waving bye-bye to $145 million of their cold, hard crypto coins.  Source: The Hacker News.

 

Apple to Release iOS 12.1.4 to Fix Facetime Bug This Week

In what has got to be the worst iPhone bug in a long time – one that allowed hackers to eavesdrop on iPhone users by exploiting a Facetime bug until Apple deactivated group calls on Facetime worldwide – Apple seems to be slow to respond.  Uncharacteristically.  Very.  Slow.

My guess is that the problem was technically hard to fix even though it was technically easy to exploit.  In any case, iOS 12.1.4 should be out this week and it is supposed to fix the security hole. Source: ZDNet .

 

Online Casino Leaves Data on 100+ Million Bets Unprotected

Security Researcher Justin Paine found a public Elastic Search database unprotected online.

Contents include information such as name, address, birthdate, email, phone, etc. as well as bet information such as winnings amount.   When ZDnet reached out to the companies involved – there seems to be multiple companies with some common ownership and based in Cyprus and operating under a Curacao gaming license, they did not immediately reply, but the server went dark.

The company, Mountberg Limited, did reach out later thanking Justin for letting them know, but not making any statement about their client’s data.  Source: ZDNet .

 

Germany Tells Facebook Not to Combine User Data Without Explicit Permission 

The Europeans are not happy with U.S. big tech.

In a ruling NOT related to GDPR, Germany’s Federal Cartel Office (FCO) says that Facebook cannot combine Instagram, Whatsapp and third party data into the user’s Facebook profile without explicit user permission and having the user check a box that says, something like, “we are going to do some stuff; you should read our 19 page description” is not adequate.

The regulator says that by doing this Facebook is abusing its monopoly power.  Facebook, not surprisingly disagrees and says that the regulator is out of line.  Stay tuned.  If this rule stands, it could have a big impact on all companies that aggregate data from third parties without fully telling their clients.  Source: BBC .

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmailby feather

Security News Bites for the Week Ending February 1, 2019

GDPR Gone Crazy

I think we’re gonna need a bigger boat!

According to the European Commission, Europe’s data protection regulators received more than 95,000 complaints about possible data breaches in the first 8 months of GDPR.

At the same time businesses reported over 41,000 breaches.

But regulators only opened 255 investigations.

Many of the complaints were related to email marketing,  telemarketing and video surveillance.  Source: Bleeping Computer.

 

1987 and 1999 DNS Standards to be Enforced Soon

We often think about things moving at Internet speed.  Except when it comes to Internet standards.

On or about February 1, 2019, many major DNS resolver vendors are going to release upgrades that will stop supporting many DNS band-aids that have been implemented over the years to allow non-compliant DNS software to work – albeit slowly.  Major DNS providers such as Google, Cisco, Quad 9, Cloudflare and others have all agreed to rip off these band-aids in the next few weeks.  If your DNS vendor does not operate a fully 1987 or 1999 compliant DNS service, your web site will go dark to users of these major DNS resolvers.

You can test your DNS service provider by going to www.DNSFlagDay.Net and entering your domain name.  If it passes then there is nothing to worry about.  If it fails, talk to your DNS provider ASAP.  Source: DNSFlagDay .

 

Alastair Mactaggart Says He Thinks CCPA Will Survive

Alastair Mactaggart, who is the reason that the California Consumer Protection Act was passed, says that he believes that the CCPA will survive the attacks by telecom companies and the tech industry.  After all, with all of the negative news about tech companies, Congressional investigations, etc., the tech companies need to watch out for negative press.  Also, people are getting used to Europe’s GDPR.  Stay tuned – it doesn’t mean that they won’t try. Source: The Recorder.

 

Russia Targeting Robert Mueller’s Investigation Directly

Prosecutors revealed this week that The Kremlin sent reporters a trove of documents supposedly leaked from the Mueller investigation.

In reality, the Kremlin mixed documents that had actually been leaked or filed with the courts with fake documents that they created in an attempt to change the narrative around the investigation.

The reporters were very excited to receive the trove of documents but equally disappointed when they figured out that they were being targeted by a Russian disinformation campaign.

Obviously, the Russians have not given up their old ways and will continue to try and create disinformation if it works to their best interest.   Source: NBC.

 

FBI is Notifying Victims of North Korea Joanap Malware

The FBI and the Air Force have gotten the U.S. courts approval to infiltrate a North Korean botnet to create a map of Americans whose computers are infected.

While the malware is very old and can be detected by anti virus software, there are still large numbers of infected computers.

The FBI is using the map to get ISPs to notify users of infected computers and in some cases is directly contacting the infected users to clean up their computers.  Source:  Ars Technica.

 

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmailby feather

Facebook 0, Apple 1; Google is Collateral Damage

You would think that in light of all of the negative publicity that Facebook has had, it would reign in some of it’s badder practices, but maybe they are just daring Congress to regulate them.

Facebook created a VPN product called Onavo Protect.  The public claim was that it was designed to protect your traffic, but in reality, it was a data collection tool since every web site that you visited, every search query you made and every link that you clicked on while using their VPN was visible and captured (and sold) by Facebook.

When the Ka-Ka hit the proverbial rotating air movement device (AKA the sh*t hit the fan) Apple banned the product from the iWorld.

Well Facebook is not easily deterred.

Unlike Android, Apple makes it difficult for developers to bypass the Apple store, in part to protect users and in part so that Apple can control developers.  But, in order to get enterprises to allow employees to use iPhones for work, Apple created an Enterprise signing certificate.  According to the rules, apps signed with those certificates can only be used inside a company.

Facebook decided that those rules did not apply to them and used that enterprise certificate to distribute an app to users age 13 to 35 where Facebook paid users up to $20 a month plus referral fees to install an app called Facebook Research.  Under the hood, it is just Onavo Protect that collects all of a user’s Internet activity so that they can better target that high value demographic.  To hide what they were doing, they offered it through several “beta testing” firms.

After Apple found out about it they REVOKED – aka invalidated – Facebook’s enterprise certificate.  Not only did this shut down the Facebook Research app, but also shut down any iPhone apps that Facebook was using internally to run it’s business.  This gave Apple a huge crowbar to swing at Facebook’s head to get them to change their ways.

As a side note, Google was also doing the same thing (with a product called Screenwise), although not quite so covertly and Apple also revoked their enterprise cert.  Of course, 99% of the people at Google likely use Google or other Android phones, so the impact on Google is likely a lot less than at Facebook.  Google shut down the service before Apple whacked them and apologized.  Facebook did neither of those.

After some behind the scenes begging, no doubt, Apple restored Facebook’s cert after a day and a half.

Facebook is saying that users should trust them.  Some Congress-people are suggesting a new law may be required.  Certainly, they are not doing a great job at building trust.

So what does all this mean to a user?

Since this was targeted, in part, at kids under 18, parents need to educate kids that they should not sell their soul for $20 a month.  Apparently both Facebook and Google think this is a good business model.

It also indicates how much your data is worth.  There were millions of copies installed and if they were paying $20 a month per user plus other perks, that means that the data was worth hundreds of millions of dollars a month to them.

If adults think that selling all of their data – every single click that they make online plus all of the data going up and down – for $20 a month, I guess that is okay, but kids are probably not in a position to make an informed decision.

By the way, because of how the software was installed, they would have the ability to see every password, your banking information and your health information, in addition to your surfing habits.

But trust them;  they wouldn’t keep that data.  Or use it.  Or sell it.

Definitely a case of buyer beware.

Information from the post came from Apple Insider, here and here.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmailby feather